History of Plant Taxonomy
Taxonomy is probably the oldest science and certainly almost from the
beginning of human existence plants have been classified based on their
edibility, and other uses to humans.
A. Note three cultures all based on different member of grass family:
European - wheat, Oriental - rice, American - maize (corn).
B. The development of western plant taxonomy has at least five distinct
periods:
-
Preliterate
-
Ancient literate
-
Medieval or dark ages
-
Renaissance
-
Theory of Evolution
I. Preliterate - since this is pre written record, we have little direct
knowledge of this period.
A. However, through the years, all cultures have learned which of the
plants around them are useful, whether for medicines, food, clothing, shelter,
weapons, etc.
B. We certainly have much archaeological evidence and even information
from ancient paintings, drawings or utensils, and even common sense tells us
that humans have always known something about the plants around them and their
uses. Obviously they knew which were edible and which were poisonous.
C. Also virtually all civilizations have taken advantage of the medicinal
properties of plants. In most cultures the medicinal aspects of plants were
closely guarded secrets and probably passed on from medicine man to medicine
man.
1. In almost all cultures, even today, medicinal information is
concentrated in the hands of a few, whether it be witch doctors, medicine
men, shamans or even doctors. As you will shortly see, its only in the past
few hundred years that plant taxonomy has progressed past classification
based on medicinal properties.
D. Even today we can learn a great deal about plants from so called
"primitive" cultures that are occasionally discovered.
1. We often learn that they have many uses for plants that were
previously unknown. In fact today there are government sponsored botanical
expeditions to little known cultures, particularly in the tropics, to learn
local uses of plants.
a. Many have already given us valuable products, e.g. just from Latin
America: potato, sweet potato, tomato, cassava (manioc), rubber, cocoa and
numerous medicinal plants such as quinine, cocaine and its derivatives or
tobacco.
II. Ancient literate western civilization - the development of writing
is certainly a major milestone in human history and it's therefore not
surprising that what we know of western taxonomy starts in ancient Greece.
A. Theophrastos ca. 300 BC, Greek who studied under Plato and
Aristotle and considered grandfather of botany.
1. He wrote more than 200 works only a few of which survived. The most
important were: Enquiry Into Plants, and The
Causes of Plants. Was a friend of Alexander the Great who had a
botanical interest and who sent him plants from his travels.
2. Wrote about 500 species of plants and described cotton, pepper,
cinnamon, bananas and named many modern genera including Asparagus and Narcissus.
Among his most significant observations are:
-
distinctions between external (organs) vs. internal (tissue)
structures.
-
distinction between different kinds of tissues.
-
classification into trees, shrubs, subshrubs and herbs.
-
distinction between flowering vs. non-flowering plants.
-
recognition of different kinds of sexual & asexual
reproduction.
-
understood basic anatomy, e.g. sepals & petals modified
leaves.
-
true understanding of fruits.
B. Pliny the Elder Roman (ca. 50 AD) chief work was Natural
History a multivolume work of which 37 volumes survive, in which he
tried to record everything that was known about the world. About 1/4 was devoted
to Biology. Most of the botany was devoted to medicine or agriculture. For more
than 1,000 yrs. this work revered and it was one of the first to be printed by
movable type.
C. Dioscorides - Greek contemporary of Pliny in 1st century AD. Wrote
one of the oldest surviving and most influential natural history books ever
written, Materia Medica.
It was an account of plants of medicinal value.
1. Until the Renaissance (1500's) this was the reference work.
During the Dark Ages it was copied and recopied and the figures redrawn so
many times that they bore little resemblance to the original. However, since
the masses couldn't read anyone who possessed a copy was guaranteed fortune
and success, it allowed one to practice pharmacy and medicine. It recognized
some natural families such as the mints and carrot as well as some modern
genera such as Aloe.
III. Medieval or Dark Ages - The period from the fall of Rome to the
Renaissance often called Dark Ages because very little original thought or work.
What little scholarship there was consisted of copying the ancient works of the
Greeks and Romans. Unfortunately this led to considerable loss of information or
much misinformation.
A. Only one botanist of note:
Albertus Magnus (St. Albert) ca. 1250.
Employed classification which recognized mono vs. dicots as well as vascular
vs. nonvascular.
IV. Renaissance - started ca. 14th century Italy and
marked by period of original thought and flowering of the arts, literature and
the beginnings of modern science.
A. Two major technological innovations contributed to Renaissance and
especially to plant taxonomy:
1. printing press
2. science of navigation
The former made knowledge available to all and botanical-medical books
called herbals became popular. Navigation started the age of
exploration and almost immediately the number of known plants increased
dramatically. New systems of classification were needed to handle this
increase.
B. Basically four distinct periods to this era.
1. Herbalists - (1500's ) motivated by practical considerations, i.e.
medical and agricultural uses of plants.
a. No real systems of classification but marked period of original work
rather than copying the ancients work. These books were based on first hand
observations by the authors and provided detailed and accurate description
of the plants of medicinal use.
b. Several prominent Germans: Brunfels, Bock, Fuchs (Fuchsia).
2. 17th century - Large numbers of new plants from voyages
necessitated better systems of classification.
a. Caesalpino - (Italian) tried to base classification on logic
rather than utilitarian concepts (such as medicinal uses). He realized that
some features are more meaningful than others in classification, a priori
reasoning (today emphasis on floral features).
b. During this period Aristotle's type concept came into
vogue. Maintained that species non-varying and fixed entities and based on
an ideal or fixed embodiment or type. Generally thought to be the ideal
created by god. Not to be confused with nomenclatural type concept.
c. Bauhin (Swiss) Wrote Pinax which was a register of plants
know to science at that time.
1. He also included other names for the plants, i.e. SYNONYMY.
Also generally credited with modern concept of genera and species.
2. He also experimented with BINOMIAL system of naming plants.
3. Linnaean period - 18th century. By end of 17th century there were
too many new plants to deal with and plants were referred to by descriptive
Latin phrases.
a. Linnaeus, a Swedish physician, is considered the father of plant
taxonomy and one of his works, Species Plantarum (1753) is the
starting point for modern taxonomy.
b. He realized that some characters were more useful than others and he
developed a Sexual System of classification which was based on the
numbers of reproductive parts. Purely artificial but allowed one to easily
identify an unknown plant by keying it out much as we do today.
c. He described 100's of species, all binomials that have a L.
after them. His most significant contribution was the consistent use of the binomial
system in which each species was referred to by only two names, the
genus and specific epithet.
d. Species Plantarum (May 1, 1753) is the nomenclatural
starting point for virtually all plant names.
4. Natural systems - by late 1700's botanist began to ponder the
purposes of taxonomy and to try to provide more information content in their
classifications, i.e. they wanted to reflect "natural
relationships". Although Linnaeus had provided a convenient method for
identifying plants, it was clearly artificial, e.g. Cacti and pines were
classified together because they had numerous male parts.
a. Adanson - rejected a priori choice of characters and felt that
using as many characters as possible would give the most natural or useful
classification.
-
This is the precursor of Phenetic or modern computer aided Numerical
Taxonomy which is often called Adansonian Taxonomy.
b. de Jussieu's a French family (mid 1700 to 1800's) included 4
botanists, father and sons. First to arrange plants into a natural system,
i.e. plants which looked alike were grouped together.
-
Arranged the plants in the Paris botanical garden in such a fashion.
c. Bentham & Hooker Englishmen of late 1800's worked out of Kew
Gardens in London and largely responsible for establishing it as foremost
systematic institution in the world. Much of the material from early
explorations was deposited here.
-
Wrote Genera Plantarum over 20 years, was a compendium of
generic descriptions arranged in a natural system. Their descriptions were
taken from original material and are noted for their completeness and
detail and are still widely consulted today.
V. Theory of Evolution -
Darwin published his
On the Origin of
Species in 1859. Almost immediately accepted by scientists and
rapidly became one of the unifying concepts of biology.
A. Two major concepts impacted on classification:
1. species have evolved from one another over time, i.e. species have
evolutionary histories - Phylogenies.
2. species are not represented by ideal types as Aristotle thought, but
by variable populations.
B. Since Darwin's time most systems of classification have tried to
reflect evolutionary relationships.
1. The first to do so were the Germans, particularly
Engler
and Prantl who wrote multivolume Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien
from 1887-1915. They arranged the plants in an evolutionary sequence
starting with the presumed primitive ones and ending with the most advanced.
-
One major flaw was their assumption that simple equals primitive.
Now known that many seemingly simple structures evolved from more
complex structures via reductions. E.g. some plants don't have both
sepals and petals, these might be considered as primitive and plants
that have both might be considered advanced. However information from
the study of fossils as well as anatomy indicate that some primitive
flowers had both sepals and petals and the ones that evolved from them
lost one or both.
-
Until about 1980 it was the world standard and all herbaria
and floras were arranged according to it. Now replaced by Cronquist
system which we'll use.
2. Bessey - from U. Nebraska early 20th century devised a set of
dicta as to what features were primitive versus what were advanced.
-
Primitive refers to those found in the most ancient plants, advanced
are found in the most recently evolved plants. Bessey developed a system
of classification based on these dicta and it resembled a cactus.
3. Cronquist
(Cronquist system) from NY Botanical Garden and
Takhtajan
from Botanical Institute in St. Petersburg (Leningrad).
-
Working independently they both came up with strikingly similar
classifications around 1968. Both represent syntheses of data
from virtually all areas of botanical science, e.g. anatomy, genetics,
physiology, paleobotany, chemistry, etc.
-
Cronquist's seems to have gained much wider reception and is now
most popular, probably in large part to being in English.
Other work which has influenced modern taxonomy
I. By the beginning of the 20th century most botanists realized there
were some problems with species concepts but most agreed that species were
morphologically distinct entities. Also by beginning of this century the floras
of Europe and Northern America were largely past the pioneer and consolidation
phases and sufficiently well known that many scientists began experimental or
biosystematic investigations of plants. Although not necessarily taxonomists and
some not even botanists, their work has had profound influences on plant
systematics.
A. O. Winge (1917) Denmark demonstrated the utility of using
characters of chromosomes and noted different chromosome numbers in plants. Cytology,
cytotaxonomy.
B. Turesson (1920's -30's) a Swede began experimental studies to
document variation within species, genecology. Populations of species were
adapted to different environments, ecotypes.
C. Camp and Gilly 1930-40's wrote on the species concept in plants.
Plants much more complex than animals and no satisfactory single species
definition. They recognized a dozen different types of species.
4. Clausen,
Keck &
Heisey 1940's began series of elaborate
transplant experiments in different environments in California. Contributed
significantly to ecotype concept. Important in speciation.
5. Huxley 1940 edited New Systematics argued that old taxonomy was dead
and new approaches were needed.
6. Alston & Turner 1959
Biochemical Systematics recognized the
importance of chemistry in taxonomy
7. Hennig - 1966 a German zoologist published work on phylogenetic
analysis called cladistics. Once this work was translated, it had a major
influence on plant classification. It set out some rules and procedures for
phylogenetic analysis and has had a major influence on modern plant taxonomy.
We'll cover some aspects of cladistic analysis.
8. Palmer early 1980's - field of molecular systematics, began using
DNA
analyses.
Current taxonomic activities are largely concentrated
in three major areas:
1. Monographs - detailed investigations of a particular taxon, i.e.
a genus, subgenus, section, species etc. Includes complete descriptions,
distributions, keys to the taxa and other information such as chromosome
numbers, historical or ecological data.
2. Floristics - inventories and manuals of plants for particular
regions. Still much to be done. Great Plains Flora,
Jepson Manual for
California, Flora of North America. Major emphasis in
tropical areas.
3. Biosystematic or evolutionary - modern methods to investigate
phylogenetic relationships. Often part of monographic works.
|